Keep reading if you are troubled in your ‘gut’ about the direction of the United States, but find it difficult to explain why.
You may intuitively know something is seriously wrong, but find the cause difficult to define or describe.
The problem is a push by powerful leaders and global billionaires to turn the world into an Open Society, and the United States stands in the way.
Author Matt Pulambo in his book The Man Behind the Curtain documents billionaire George Soros funding non-profits and non-government organizations (NGOs) to transform the United States (and the world) into an Open Society. Soros’ foundation is called the Open Society Foundation (OPS).
The distinctive borders, attributes, and documents (The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution) of the United States must disappear for the world to become a global OPEN SOCIETY.
Forbes Magazine has written of Soros’ efforts:
“Since 1987, Soros has published 14 books and a number of pieces in the New York Review of Books, New York Times and elsewhere. These texts make it clear that, like many on the centre-left who rose to prominence in the 1990s, Soros’s defining intellectual principle is his internationalism. For Soros, the goal of contemporary human existence is to establish a world defined not by sovereign states, but by a global community whose constituents understand that everyone shares an interest in freedom, equality and prosperity. In his opinion, the creation of such a global open society is the only way to ensure that humanity overcomes the existential challenges of climate change and nuclear proliferation.”
An Open Society is DIRE for the United States.
D – Democracy. The rule of the majority (democracy) is the standard for an Open Society. Whereas the Republic of the United States is based on the Rule of Law (The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution), if the majority of people want to kill babies in the womb (abortion), then it should be allowed. The United States of America’s Founding Fathers feared democracy. But for an Open Society to exist, the Republic must fall and democracy must be instituted. When you hear people say, “Save our Democracy!” what they are advocating is an Open Society.
I – Individuality. The father of Open Society philosophy was Karl Popper. To Popper, an Open Society depends on individualism, not collectivism. The needs, wants, and desires of the individual are paramount in an Open Society. In a closed collectivist society, people must share common, cultural values to maintain social harmony, get along with others, and meet social expectations. For example, on D-Day, collectivist Americans stormed Normandy sharing the common ideals and values of the United States. It would be difficult to imagine young people in an Open Society sharing such ideals (or storming enemy beaches in the name of Liberty).
R-Relativity. In an Open Society, there is no dogma (truth). What is the truth is simply what the individual perceives as truth. Therefore, any Divine truth or declared moral truth that is immutable (Natural Law) is the enemy of an Open Society. In the name of tolerance, all truth must be accepted. What a person declares as his truth is the truth. Therefore, 2 plus 2 may equal 5 in an Open Society, just as the declaration of a boy that he is a girl must be welcomed as truth. There is no room for “the truth” in an Open Society, only tolerance for others’ declaring “their truth.”
E-Equality. The Open Society Foundation states on its website, “Open Society-U.S. supports efforts to advance equality, fairness, and justice, with a focus on the most marginalized communities and the most significant threats to open society in the United States. Open Society-U.S. is committed to building a vibrant, inclusive, and more just society in the United States.” To advocates of an Open Society, equal outcomes are essential, not equal opportunity. If someone has less than others (the marginalized), then those with more (the privileged) must give to the marginalized.
An Open Society is DIRE. The United States of America is just the opposite of an Open Society.
The USA is a Republic, not a Democracy. The USA places the collective ideals above the individuals’ ideals. The USA believes in a Creator and His Laws of Nature, believing truth is immutable and eternal, not individual and relative. The USA is a place of equal opportunity, but never equal outcomes.
The USA is the biggest hindrance to an eventual globalocracy run by globalcrats.
I don’t believe the LORD will allow a true Open Society for the world to exist. I believe the Scriptures, and the Bible declares:
“God has made every nation … and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings” (Acts 17:24-27).
Like the Apostle Paul, I trust in the Creator who made the boundaries of all nations, and I will resist all attempts to implement an Open Society.
Hello Wade,
you included a map with this post and I wondered about its source and also about its significance related to the post.
Can you clarify this please? And thanks.
Google states: “Today, over 80% of the world’s people live in places where there is some form restriction, discrimination, or ongoing persecution because of their beliefs. (A picture shows:)
“It is the anguished face of a Rohingya mother in Myanmar whose baby son has been ripped from her arms by soldiers and flung into a fire. The tragic human faces of religious persecution are diverse and they are many — Copts in Egypt, Baha’i in Yemen, Christians in North Korea and China, Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia, and religious minorities throughout Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.”
REX RAY, we need a ‘time-out’ for a good laugh . . . . take a look:
“An elderly Florida lady did her shopping and upon returning to her car, found four males in the act of leaving with her vehicle. She dropped her shopping bags and drew her handgun, proceeding to scream at the top of her lungs,
“I have a gun, and I know how to use it! Get out of the car – NOW!”
The four men didn’t wait for a second threat. They got out and ran like mad. The lady, somewhat shaken, then proceeded to load her shopping bags into the back of the car and got into the driver’s seat. She was so shaken that she could not get her key into the ignition. She tried and tried, and then she realized why. It was for the same reason she had wondered why there was a football, a Frisbee, and two 12-packs of beer in the front seat.
A few minutes later, she found her own car parked four or five spaces farther down. She loaded her bags into her own car and drove to the police station to report her mistake. The Sergeant to whom she told the story couldn’t stop laughing! He pointed to the other end of the counter, where four pale men were reporting a carjacking by a mad, elderly woman described as white, less than five feet tall, glasses, curly white hair, and carrying a large handgun.”
REX RAY, we need a ‘time out’ for a good laugh. Take a look . . . . .
“An elderly Florida lady did her shopping and upon returning to her car, found four males in the act of leaving with her vehicle. She dropped her shopping bags and drew her handgun, proceeding to scream at the top of her lungs,
“I have a gun, and I know how to use it! Get out of the car – NOW!”
The four men didn’t wait for a second threat. They got out and ran like mad. The lady, somewhat shaken, then proceeded to load her shopping bags into the back of the car and got into the driver’s seat. She was so shaken that she could not get her key into the ignition. She tried and tried, and then she realized why. It was for the same reason she had wondered why there was a football, a Frisbee, and two 12-packs of beer in the front seat.
A few minutes later, she found her own car parked four or five spaces farther down. She loaded her bags into her own car and drove to the police station to report her mistake. The Sergeant to whom she told the story couldn’t stop laughing! He pointed to the other end of the counter, where four pale men were reporting a carjacking by a mad, elderly woman described as white, less than five feet tall, glasses, curly white hair, and carrying a large handgun.”
is ‘manifest destiny’ the same thing as believing that God ‘sets the boundaries for all nations’?
not understanding . . . . . it seems that boundaries between countries have been moved by acts of men aggressively at times and acts of people inflicting great harm on indigenous inhabitants . . . . . the events of great destruction and ‘attrition’ (as Ukraine is now experiencing from Putin) does not seem to be a work of the Creator but more of the exhibition of a deranged human autocrat seeking his own empire . . . a case of mental illness in the extreme that will destroy what it cannot have all the way down to the boneyard
God is ‘Creator’, yes
but how can we say that God ‘uses’ evil men to do His bidding ???
what is the thinking here?
?
Personally, I consider the existence and works of the WEF to be the pretext of the coming Babylon and stage being set to usher in the next phase of the concluding chapters of this age. I realize that is considerable conjecture, but it is based upon Biblical description given to us.